Connect with us

Entertainment

The Grammy nominating committee simply had to go (opinion)

Published

on

The Grammy nominating committee simply had to go (opinion)


RIP as “The Room That Happens”, Grammy’s Blue Ribbon Committee, which has officially taken a break this year since it has been an integral part of the nomination process in most categories since the 1990s. Those who aren’t insiders won’t have to take on the role of Aaron Burr, wondering if there really is any smoke that fills the room, and if so, what kind of smoke is there. The hazy fog is being replaced by the fresh air of “transparency” rather than a moment or voting year.

The musician community, the general public, and most of the recording academy members will have a “don’t knock on the door on the way out” attitude to the nominating committee looking out for themselves. Prioritizing public voting is a very popular concept throughout 2021. A very convincing advocate of the Grammy Council, unless it’s empty but in a state well represented by the federal government like North Dakota, or if you’re not one of the obscure artists who benefited from: What didn’t seem to work for Weekend recently was a really long boiling problem that I’ve seen recording academies put on fire for a long time. What happened this week Had to get up, Although it is still shocking that the board has given up the committee system without taking pride in the cold and dead hands.

But with that said, it could inevitably be lost if the next Grammy nomination is won by a total membership of more than 11,000 people, not by the imaginary or real group of experts in each category. The curator approach introduced in the 90s is for the reason to keep the Grammy from becoming a purely popular contest with such a massive membership. We’ve already won American Music Awards, and the reason didn’t have to be two. One of them contains the imminence of the music industry instead of hoi polloi. With the start of the committee, the lineup of candidates for each category was typically about half of the popular contests and half of the WTF. But you can’t deny it. good The WTF selection is mixed with the purer WTF.

After all, some of the best nominees for the Academy (or its committees) may be worth the sacrifice if it no longer means the most prestigious prestige of music is at least semi-arbitrarily deviated. Sometimes throwing away your baby with bath water is a risk worth taking.

I’m the first Report to the committee system For Billboard in 2017, to understand what was a much less open process at the time, we talked to committee members and management committees, as well as official representatives, about why the recording academy sticks to what it’s easy to see as elitist. Wouldn’t it really be nice to have the grand prize for popular music being so non-populist? Those who support it (and still the majority at that point) made good examples collectively for why putting the final nomination in the hands of a chosen few is less of all possible evils.

“I was very tired of reading some publications on our’secret committee’,” said Bill Freimuth, Senior Vice President of Awards Ceremony at the Recording Academy. “They are no secret. We try to be pretty transparent about this. … ‘Elitist’ is a very powerful word especially these days. You have to look at the populist antonym. And there are other awards for music depending on their popularity. Ultimately (nominations) go down to the people sitting in the room, but those people went through a rather rigorous screening process through the branch system, the national board of directors, and other members of the genre community. It’s all in that “sometimes it might not be that good in the market” can boost a less likely option.

One caretaker said, “I don’t know if there is ultimately another way. [besides the blue-ribbon committees]. When I go to a meeting, I come to think that this is really the best way to do it. It’s an imperfect system that tries to be as perfect as possible.”

However, if you look at the list of candidates each year, you can see that the committee goes from being not cool enough to being too cool. Originally, the commission was seen as a corrective action against Tony Bennett’s “MTV Unplugged” winning Album of the Year, especially when it reached the top categories of all genres. The general feeling is at least the “Three Tenors” album that he came up with at the time. Bennett went out, and Beck… the latter! (We apologize to Heart, San Francisco, etc.)

Nevertheless, the Grammy was still considered a bastion of old guard sentiment, at least until the mid-2000s. On the same album in this year’s category, Santana beat TLC. Steely Dan beat Eminem. Ray Charles conquered Kanye West. Herbie Hancock beat Amy Winehouse (also Kanye… it’s been a running theme for quite some time). Then it entered the era of the commission’s over-correction.

The Blue Ribbon Panel, which determined this year’s record and album nominations, seemed to have been operating for years under these assumptions. Nominated for one of the existing veteran or famous liquor smashes, the general membership couldn’t have thus dared to nominate Ed Sheeran, who owned one of the undeniable mainstream pop songs of that century, or the most acclaimed Bob Dylan in 25 years. Because either way would be an obvious Grammy bait. File members… and the victory of a pop superstar with little critical convictions or an old man with a rookie dating back to the 60s would be bad for the academy’s image in honor of the Vanguard.

Now, perhaps that kind of exclusion (or closing of Weeknd’s tipping point) wasn’t brought down to the deliberate choice of committee members. Sheeran’s “Shape of You” or Abel Tesfaye’s “Blinding Lights” or, on the other hand, Dylan, on the other hand, may not have made the top 20 choices that were handed over to the committee by regular members because they spewed critically on “Rough and Rowdy Ways.” Hack the last field of 8. Or that choice was handed over to them, and the committee did not take into account the optics of the organization, but thought that Jacob Collier had made an album better than Dylan, or that the moderately successful “Colors” of Black Pumas was evident. It’s a better record than the “Blinding Lights” monster. But the truth is, we don’t even know if Edna Bob or anyone else will come to the room, unless the debate between those 20 or so decision makers leaks out.

And, due to the lack of translucency as to how seriously or carelessly these issues were carried out behind closed doors, we all Aaron Burr… Teacher.

But what will you lose for transparency? Interesting and/or obvious oddities. Heim’s “Women in Music Pt. III” was nominated for Album of the Year in this round? Or maybe Brandi Carlile’s “By the Way, I Forgive You” secretly hid her two years ago, effectively making her a pseudonym on TV shows. What is the likelihood that one of these would have been on the final ballot without the committee’s curator power? slim.

And the commission was foresight at that time. When reporting stories about the process in early 2017, part of the whisper about the system at the time was that someone without a name like Anderson.Paak could nominate too many nominations. No one sees it as an abuse of committee power.

At the end of 2019 I Variety In a column titled “Why the Grammy Council Voting System Needs Overhaul,” then new Academy CEO Deborah Dugan argued that the secret room had to be removed after an unexpected, strangely advanced candidate from Taylor Swift to Tyler was shut down. Creator. “It seems like the time has come for Grammy to advocate for multiple decision making,” I wrote. “At least we’ll be wondering if someone with the loudest voice in the conference room is in gambling debt.” But if you look back at some of the things that raise your eyebrows at that particular time, you’ll see that among them there was a huge Grammy look from year to year for commercial lans like Bon Iver and HER. These repetitive choices were undoubtedly a choice. For a committee that doesn’t have a lot of turnover every year, it’s hard to argue that this is an unrealistic choice given that all Taylor Swift fans are now Bon Iver fans and HER just won an Oscar. We haven’t released a full album yet, or we haven’t had a big hit yet.

But we’re here not to praise the commission system, but to bury it. While some of the committee’s “what were you thinking” choices turned out to be far more defensive than others, the fact that all amateur or programmer observers demand it every year was evidence of a long-standing change. Dugan should not raise this in any legal action against the Academy. Shock, To know that gambling is going on at this restaurant) or Weeknd publicly and perhaps legitimately became a sick loser and put it on the janitor’s front burner. Harvey Mason, Jr., who helped cross the finish line.

Most importantly, the recording academy’s vote to abolish the committee is in favor of believing in reforms that have already been implemented. The organization has been on a mission for many years to expand and diversify membership and eliminate people who do not have an active and sustained participation in the music business. Grabbing the blue ribbon process effectively said: Yes, we have made great progress in representation… I still can’t believe them.

You should not trust ordinary members to properly nominate a Grammy nomination. It’s going to be a little harder to say Grammy in AMA. There are not many seemingly out-of-the-box nominations and bold advocacy candidates. But if we leave it to the whole voter block at least so that the whole process goes into hell, at least we’ll be able to get 11,000 blame.





Originally reported by Source link

The featured images are, as they appear on the original report.

Entertainment

NewFronts Postmortem: Originals are available for free streaming

Published

on

NewFronts Postmortem: Originals are available for free streaming


this week newFronts saw a trend appear freeTreaming service looking for battle ViacomCBS” Pluto tv This is the title of the most viewed free service.

Unlike Pluto, which has a deep vault, Library content to be used to create branded channels — “Mission: ImpossibleE,”“CSI,“”Dora TV“And”Paramount Movie Channel” Fox’s Tubi, Amazon’s IMDb TV and Chicken Soup for Soul’s Crackle and moreI’m going to use NewFront Presentation To show how they are Diversification From content licensing to creative content creation.

this It’s not a new strategy. Crackle started making the original with “Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee”. 2012, And its Plan for 2021 include Original documentary and documentSeries, new chicken soup for the soul-brand AVOD and FAST service Released at the end of the year.

News to be The number of free streaming services you want to differentiate original. There’s so much content available for licensing due to the lack of content vaults, and SVODs with more pockets are often sweeping the most exciting options.

Among the announced plans IMDb TV Most SVOD-esque, In the sense of scale and quality. During Prolific TV producer Dick Wolf is no stranger to creating programs that distribute NBC’s “Law & Order” and “Chicago” franchises and CBS’s “FBI” franchises for free.Previously, it had nothing to do with free streaming. The same goes for Judge Judy, who hosts a new court show on Amazon’s free platform.

IMDb TV’s strategy is one of high quality. For content, especially AVOD. This is Tubi, Crackle And Roku is also engaged in battles to attract audiences in very different ways. Tubi and Crackle are largely away from scripting, and both streamers announce their documentary plans.ies and documentseries. Tovidonas Release many Animation title production Fox stables lunch box, which bring forths “Bob’s BurGer.

Roku is already soaking their feet in the original water, releasing the TV show “Cypher” earlier this spring. Of this doubleEd Down with buy Quibi Content library (multiple largemaleE “Spielberg’s After Dark to be unveiled for the first time on Roku.

this is acquisition Woke up in january, Roku is not releasing “new” content beyond that. Former brand change Quibi Marked with “Roku original.”

If your Roku channel has both VOD and FAST featuresnd Quibi The content has been set Until 10 to 12 minutes If Roku doesn’t create a “Roku Originals” FAST channel in the episode, you’ll miss out on the chance. existence Effective On demand, This length as content Built for the channel. Surf at FAST.

Pluto TV wasn’t at NewFronts. Of this The strategy for 2021 will be the same as it has seen tremendous growth over the past two years, and now the average monthly users worldwide is over 49 million (Pluto TV is no longerorts US figures). This means more packaging. ViacomCBS Brands with great brand appeal at the show level — I.e., “NCIS” or “Hawaii” 5-0”— Viacom-driven strategies that have driven the interests of the original audience, such as channels “MTV” and “Nickelodeon”.

A & E Networks are also held Of this first NewFronts presentation, Focusing on Of this Reach platform. During this It primarily involves accessing A&E’s portfolio through: Pay TV When using certified apps on connected TVs and devices, it’s worth noting that A&E’s portfolio of FAST channels available on the FAST platform is growing. Lively place, Thrill + skill and Crime 360.

This is another example of using bolts in ord.Earn more money with older content. NBCUniversal is Peacock But You can do much more with what’s available. thereto. NBCU diagram did Of this First NewFront Instead of discussing the content, it focuses on new advanced advertising methods available to ad buyers..

In the battle to increase total watch time (a monetizable viewing metric for ad-supported streaming) emptied service Those who do not have a deep vault are looking for new ways to differentiate themselves. NowAlthough, the plans seem reasonable and not an arms race for content, there are enough new programs to differentiate them. SVOD. Concerns should be expressed when these changes occur, but for now, the move to originals with free AVOD seems sustainable.





Originally reported by Source link

The featured images are, as they appear on the original report.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Action, out-kick takeover highlights the craze for sports betting

Published

on

Action, out-kick takeover highlights the craze for sports betting


As the United States soon enters its fourth year as a country where sports betting takes place, Anymore With national bans, publishers with the sports betting industry are becoming increasingly attractive M&A candidates.

You can just look at last week’s deal making activity. Denmark-based sports betting media group Better Collective Consent to acquisition $240 million Action Network, Fox Announcement It took over the conservative sports news site Outkick for an undisclosed amount.

A little different, but still notable, the 5-year-old subscription-based sports site The Athletic, which publishes sports betting content on relevant tracks, is still looking for a merger partner, WSJ. Declaration Last Thursday. The sports pub is said to see NYT as a major candidate for a merger.

It is clear why digital sports betting content is increasing in value. More states legalizing sports betting will help drive new readers to gambling content entities (e.g. The Action Network). Then you have a larger pool that could potentially generate affiliate commissions (by recommending bettors to the sportsbook).

As the legalization of sports betting increases, the number of US consumers willing to pay monthly subscriptions to sports betting content has increased.

21 states and DC as of May 7th permit Single game sports betting through retail and/or online sportsbooks according to the American Games Association (AGA).

Legalized sports betting has long encouraged trading in the media space. Thin size What is likely to support this interest in the illegal gambling market is the fact that the pandemic has not completely undermined the growth of legalized sports betting.

Seven of the 11 states that offered legitimate sports betting in 2019 and 2020 saw a year-over-year increase (YoY) from last year’s bets under the AGA.

Meanwhile, online gambling advertising spending on local TV commercials has reached nearly $155 million in the first quarter of this year from around $11 million in early 2019. Nielsen.

This momentum has already emerged before last week through the media company-sports betting corporation partnership. DraftKings acheive VSiN, a Las Vegas-based sports betting media company, launched in late March, and Dish Network and DraftKings earlier this month. partner A deal that allows certain Dish viewers to start betting on the TV screen.

These deals are based on the idea that legitimate U.S. sports betting activity will continue to grow in the future. However, this growth in gambling can be better tracked by things like gambling app usage and betting amount rather than linear TV sports viewership.

For example, the average audience for NBA and NHL games declined 27% and 8% between 2019 and 2021, respectively, VIP analysis Recently melt.

While big matches are broadcast nationwide, the downgrade shouldn’t be associated too much with sports betting as betting is not legal in all states. However, the decline still means that legalized bets may not be the rating savior. Some hoped Can it be.

Meanwhile, a recent VIP analysis of Sensor Tower data showed that usage of the nation’s largest sports betting app surged during AFC/NFC Championship Week and Super Bowl Week.

Perhaps that’s why we’ve seen more sports leagues accept sports betting lately. View UFC-DraftKings in March deal and Recent statement NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell described sports bettors.

Leagues and sportsbooks will become more common as more states legalize sports betting. By 2023, up to 37 states can offer legalized sports betting. project Eilers & Krejcik.

However, a notable obstacle to accelerating sports betting activity is ensuring convenience by doing things like activating mobile betting in states where betting is legal.

Despite this seemingly obvious path to boosting gambling revenue, lawmakers in certain states may oppose making sports betting as widely accessible as possible. Contribute to Gambling addiction Among young adults.

The future for the US sports betting environment is one of the main focuses: Variety Intelligence Platform’s latest white paper “Sports Betting”. This white paper is VIP’s third in-depth sports betting focused survey that analyzes the impact of sports betting legalization and how media companies capitalize.

Read the full text of the special report





Originally reported by Source link

The featured images are, as they appear on the original report.

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Julia Louis-Dreyfus on Missing Playing Selina Meyer in’Veep’

Published

on

Julia Louis-Dreyfus on Missing Playing Selina Meyer in'Veep'


Julia Louis-Dreyfus is one of six creative leaders in comedy. VarietyThe power of women in 2021. Click here for more information.

For 30 years, Julia Louis-Dreyfus has created an Emmy-winning character, a landmark of women in popular culture. Her Elaine Benes from “Seinfeld” is your terrible old friend. Her Selina Meyer in “Veep” definitely to be. Louis-Dreyfus was a political activist, especially as Joe Biden’s deputy ahead of the 2020 elections. “It surprised me,” she said in a recent Zoom interview. And as of January 2020, she has earned the status of a tycoon by signing a multi-year overall contract with Apple. Under the terms of the contract she will of course produce, but most of them are looking for great material for herself, she says. In both comedy and drama, the latter has done less over the years. “A great idea isn’t a simple fruit. I’m like one of those pigs looking for truffles,” he adds with a smile.

Sophy Holland for Variety

Surprisingly, Louis-Dreyfus appeared in Disney Plus’s’The Falcon and the Winter Soldier’ ​​as Contessa Valentina Allegra de Fontaine, a Marvel comic book super villain often known as Madame Hydra. It was the strict secret that ignited the Internet, which sparked enthusiastic speculation about the future of Louis-Dreyfus’ high-heeled (and high-heeled) character. no It was made to walk” was the first line to steal her scene. Will the audience be able to see Louis-Dreyfus in “Black Widow” in the Marvel-Disney Plus series “Secret Invasion”? Or is it possible to see the symbolic character elsewhere where it can logically appear? Under the complete Marvel confidentiality agreement, she only said, “I always wanted to do Contessa and the Marvel Cinematic Universe made it possible.” No, she can’t provide more detailed information.

Since March of last year, Louis-Dreyfus has been “in motion” with a focus on family well-being. Particularly focused on keeping her 92-year-old mother-in-law “safe and happy”. She reads a lot with an eye for development and enjoyment, and every week at the CAA, she meets with team members who “try to find tireless material” for her. She is the French spy thriller “The Bureau” (“Oh, my God, it was so Good”) To inspire her, she relied on the New York Times Cooking app to cook countless dinners (“Lord Jesus, do I love this app”). If reading, cooking, and watching TV sound like regular COVID-closing activities, the year of Louis-Dreyfus included campaigns and fundraising for Biden, Democrats denying votes, and the Georgia US Senate Finals “full-time part-time job,” she said. “I think the Republican Party has lost its mind. This is no longer Reagan’s party.”

Breast cancer survivor Louis-Dreyfus was diagnosed in September 2017 when she tried to start filming the last season of “Veep,” which she pushed until the end of treatment. Her decisive response to the COVID treatment was “immediately”. . “Oh,” she remembers thinking. “I could see this get me.”

“I had no arrogance about this. When you face your death in the way that cancer takes you there-I strangely found the same plague.”

Experienced with cancer changed Louis-Dreyfus’ perspective, and now at the age of 60, she is rethinking the rest of her life. What I want to do with my 34-year-old husband, Brad Hall (“Travel”), and where she wants — she says “near my kids” about her son (now in her 20s). But what she calls “life is short” doesn’t apply to her work. By the way, she was vaccinated and is ready to resume. “I’m just thinking about a project with real meat in the bones,” she says. “Here’s a pretty high standard.”

Asked if he would potentially rethink his past role, Louis-Dreyfus said, “Do you know who I miss? I miss playing Selina Meyer.” Yes, “actor, writer, crew-everyone” was lost. She speaks of the HBO comedy that ended in 2019 after seven seasons. But most of the time she misses how “interesting” Selina is. “It was so inexperienced in her damn mind to play that character. It’s just freed! It was all about her self, and she had no interest in other humans.”

The series finale of “Veep” ended at Selina’s funeral. But if she wants to get the gang back together, there are certainly decades between me. Will it?

“Yes! Doing more’Veep’ will be a great joy,” says Louis-Dreyfus, “and who knows, we will someday.”


Styling: Cristina Ehrlich/The Only Agency; Makeup: Fiona Stiles/ A-Frame Agency; Hair: Aviva Perea/A-Frame Agency/R+Co Bleu; Lead image, dress: Monique Lhuillier; Bra: Agent Provocateur; Shoes: Aquazzura; Jewelry: Irene Neuwirth; Cover, top, vest and pants: Zimmerman; Rings: Ana Khouri and Irene Neuwirth</code?





Originally reported by Source link

The featured images are, as they appear on the original report.

Continue Reading

Trending